Sendungsbewusstsein

Kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den Medien

Doku zur Lage in Russland Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008

Filed under: Russland,TV — peet @ 23:37 Uhr
Tags: ,

Soeben wurde auf arte ein neuer Film gezeigt, gute Arbeit (Link). Sehr trauriges, aber leider wahres Bild. Zwei Wiederholungen werden angekündigt: am Sonntag 2. März um 12.45 Uhr und Donnerstag 13. März um 09.55 Uhr.

 

Eine andere Sicht auf den Bericht der Winograd-Kommission Sonntag, 3. Februar 2008

Filed under: Allgemein — peet @ 19:18 Uhr
Tags:

Martin van Creveld ist für seine besondere Meinung bekannt (Link), das macht die Lektüre und das Nachdenken spannend. Diesmal bewertet er das Resultat des Libanon-Krieges 2006 anders als die große Politik und seine Argumentation hat etwas für sich (Link):

It is true that the offensive did not go nearly as well as it should have, and that it brought to light numerous deficiencies in the Israeli military. However, it is also true that Hezbollah, judging by its leader’s repeated statements, was shocked by the violence of Israel’s reaction. What’s more, Syria and Iran, instead of coming to Hezbollah’s aid, did no more than replenish its weapon supply.

Meanwhile, the international community, instead of reining in Israel as it had done so often in the past, gave Olmert almost all the leeway he needed. By the time the guns fell silent, hundreds of Hezbollah fighters had been killed. The organization had been thrown out of southern Lebanon, and to make sure it would not return, a fairly robust United Nations peacekeeping force was put into place.

At least for the time being, Hezbollah appears to have had the fight knocked out of it. For well over a year now, Israel’s border with Lebanon has been almost totally quiet — by far the longest period of peace in four decades. This was something that neither Golda Meir, nor Yitzhak Rabin in his two terms as prime minister, nor Menahem Begin, nor Shimon Peres, nor Yitzhak Shamir, nor Benjamin Netanyahu, nor Ehud Barak, nor even the formidable Ariel Sharon, was able to achieve.

Given the numerous military shortcomings that the war revealed, the lion’s share of the credit belongs to Olmert. His performance may not have been perfect, but what performance ever is?

It was Olmert who decided that enough was enough and that force had to be used to end Hezbollah’s antics. It was also Olmert who, in spite of all the difficulties and in the face of numerous Israeli casualties, persisted until there was nothing more to be gained. For all this he ought to be commended, not condemned.

 

 
Folgen

Erhalte jeden neuen Beitrag in deinen Posteingang.

Schließe dich 25 Followern an